Shoud Smoking in Public Areas be Banned Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Shoud Smoking in man Areas be Banned - Essay ExamplePublic health is serious social concern that poopnot be left to the discretion of those who are endangering personal health relentlessly. Smoking is a personal choice and notwithstanding its known negative effects on human health there is no restrictive legislation to ensure this personal uncaringdom of choice. However, equally master(prenominal) are the liberties to of a non-smoker who does not want to put his health at risk. Everyone has a right to make choices that he likes baring those choices that can affect the comparable right of others. Smoking in human beings field of studys is a sort of abusing non-smokers right to safeguard their health and this is something that should not be permissible legally and morally. Smoking in open public empyreans is often defended by the argument that in first fructify it does not harm others because of open and fresh air, secondly they are free to move away from smoking site. It is rather a ridiculous argument to support smoking. Smokers cannot be allowed to pollute air at a public place only because there is a lot of fresh air and people can move around. Smoking in open and enclosed public area should not be treated separately because open public areas are mostly used to get fresh air and soothing environment. However, we can inclose separation areas for smoker at public places to ensure they have equal right to enjoy themselves. Recent research conducted by the Office of the National Statistics (ONS) launch that 63% of respondents considered that there should be smoking and non-smoking areas in pubs and bars (Health Committee, 2006) It should be clear that the ban we are talking about is not absolute in nature and we have to have exceptions in this ban. Public areas are either open or enclosed and the ban should introduce exceptions in both cases separately. near of the countries have implemented a strict ban in enclosed public area whereas a lenient appr oach is adopted for open public areas. Various states have their own perception in this regard and have implemented the ban with varying depth and exceptions. Molyneaux (2006) has pointed out this approach, Smoking is banned in all or most enclosed public places in South Africa, New Zealand, Italy and the Republic of Ireland. There are similar bans in the American states of calcium and New York. Smoking in enclosed public places was recently banned in Scotland. It will become illegal in the rest of the UK in 2007. In England and Wales, pubs that do not serve food can continue to choose to allow smoking. Though smoking is equally dangerous and hazardous for all nations however the realization at public and state level is not same. International organizations like WHO are working extensively on issues pertaining to public health and can play an important role in educating masses on the issue. The argument that secondhand smoke does not have clear links to the diseases attributed to s mokers is not a valid argument because World health Organization has rejected this argument. Chen (2007) has pointed out this clearly, The evidence is clear there is no safe level of picture show to second-hand tobacco smoke. This underlines the importance of the issue and we need persuade and convince public and authorities that the legislation to ban smoking in public areas is an imperative demand to ensure public health and safety at large. We need to focus our attentions in this area of public health because lack of awareness in this area is alarming as WHO (2009) pointed out